Breach of contract occurs when one party to a valid contract breaks its promise to the other party or parties. Most contracts end when both parties have fulfilled their obligations. But sometimes one party does not meet its obligations under the terms of the contract. When this occurs, that party is said to be in breach of the contract.
To have a claim for breach of contract, there must be a valid contract, a party who violated the terms of the contract, and another party that was damaged as a result.
A valid contract can be written or oral and must include an offer, acceptance, and consideration, or the exchange of something of value.
Breach of contract occurs when one party to the contract does not do what they said they would do. Think of a breach of contract like a broken promise. Examples of a breach of contract include:
Breach of contract lawsuits are one of the most common claims filed in U.S. courts. Judges can offer various remedies to compensate someone for a broken contract. These remedies are not intended to punish the party that broke the contract; rather, they return the injured party to the position they were in before the breach occurred.
A contract can be breached in whole or in part. A partial breach occurs when some, but not all, of the terms of the contract were violated. For example, a homeowner might request that their house be painted in Beige, but the painter used Brown. The house was painted, but the color was incorrect. The homeowner has a claim for a partial breach of contract in that the painter did not use the color specified in the contract.
A material breach of contract occurs when the party that violates the agreement does so in a way that removes the value of the contract, such as if the painter simply failed to paint the house. In this case, the homeowner can sue for damages, would not be required to pay for the painting, and would be owed any deposit that was paid. In some circumstances whether a breach is material is determined by whether there has been substantial performance. For example, if there was a contract not just to paint a house, but instead to build and complete an entire house, and the constructed house was so defective that it could not be repaired without taking down and reconstructing a substantial portion of the whole house, the contractor will be deemed not to have substantially completed the house, and despite having provide some work, will be not be allowed any recovery.
A party can also claim anticipatory breach of contract if they suspect that the other party will not meet its obligations because they did something which shows their intention not to perform under the terms of the contract. An anticipatory breach of contract might occur, for example, if a homeowner paid a deposit to have the house painted but the painter stopped responding to emails, texts, or phone calls. Proving anticipatory breach of contract can be very difficult.
To have a valid claim for breach of contract, the party claiming that the contract was breached generally must have fulfilled its obligations under the contract. In the above example, the homeowner must have made payment for the house painting and must have fulfilled any other requirements under the terms of the contract, such as telling the painter the color she wished the house to be painted.
Before filing a lawsuit, the party who is claiming the contract was breached generally must notify the other party, preferably in writing, that the other breached the contract. In some cases, especially in cases involving a contractor breaching a warranty, the property owner must give the contractor the opportunity to cure the defective work.
If a contract has been breached, the breaching party generally must take immediate steps to fix the situation. They may be able to correct their mistake before the other party is aware of the breach, or before the other party can file a lawsuit.
Many contracts contain a section that addresses what to do in the event of a breach. There may be a clause that calls for the termination of the contract or that says the parties have a certain amount of time to fix it.
If the breach cannot be quickly remedied, the breaching party should speak to the non-breaching party. This demonstrates a good faith effort to resolve the dispute, and the parties may be able to resolve the breach without the need to file a lawsuit.
The non-breaching party should, if at all possible, give the breaching party the opportunity to fix the mistake. The breaching party may be able to fix the mistake in a way that still meets the non-breaching party’s needs so both parties can come to a resolution and avoid legal action. However, the non-breaching party is not required to agree to a change in the contract that does not sufficiently benefit them for damages caused by the breach.
If attempts to resolve the breach are unsuccessful, it may be wise to enlist the assistance of an experienced breach of contract attorney
As in any lawsuit, the defendant has a right to offer proof for why the alleged breach of contract did not happen or should be excused. Common defenses to claims for breach of contract include:
If a plaintiff can prove breach of contract they are entitled to a remedy. This can include damages (an amount of money to compensate the plaintiff for the loss suffered), an injunction (a court order that requires one party to stop doing something that damages the other party), and rescission (cancellation of the contract.
If you believe someone breached a contract with you or your business, or if you’ve been accused of breaching a contract but believe you have a defense, it is important to contact a lawyer who has experience handling breach of contract claims. Details that you may think are minor or insignificant can have a profound effect on the outcome of a case. A lawyer will be able to help point out these important details and represent you in court.
A breach of contract lawyer can help by reviewing, editing, and negotiating the terms of the contract (indeed in most cases you should talk to a lawyer before signing a contract in hopes of avoiding issues that might lead to a breach). If you need to file a lawsuit, have been sued, or believe you will be sued, you should hire an attorney as soon as possible. An attorney will be able to analyze the terms of the contract, assess any available defenses available, and provide assistance in negotiating a resolution or in mediation, arbitration, or litigation.
At Fremstad Law our lawyers have handled countless breach of contract claims. North Dakota and Minnesota lawyers Joel Fremstad, James Teigland, Mark Western, Brandt Doerr, and Nick Thornton are here to help move you forward. Contact us today by calling (701) 478-7620.
© 2020 Fremstad Law
TERMS OF USE AND DISCLAIMER: Thank you for visiting the Fremstad Law Web site. Please note that the materials on our site have been prepared by us for general informational purposes and are not legal advice. We will not accept requests for legal advice over the Internet. You should not rely on any information contained herein in evaluating any specific legal issues you may have. Do not send us information about your legal issues until you speak to one of our lawyers and get authorization to do so. The firm does not and will not consider or treat any unsolicited e-mails or information sent to us, an attorney, or an employee of the firm by persons seeking legal advice or other non-clients to be confidential and the firm reserves the unconditional right to disclose or use any such unsolicited e-mails or information for any purpose. Your use of our Web site and/or sending e-mail to us or one of our lawyers does not create a lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer-client relationship is not created except by a written acknowledgment of such an engagement signed by a member of the firm. For your convenience, our Web site may contains links to other third-party sites. We do not endorse or verify the accuracy of information on such sites and are not responsible for the contents of any of these third-party resources. The inclusion of such link on this site does not imply the endorsement, recommendation or approval of that site by Fremstad Law.
