Fargo, North Dakota, December 7, 2017. Today the North Dakota Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Dawn Osborne v. Brown & Saenger, Inc., 2017 ND 288. Under North Dakota law, non-compete agreements for employees are void and unenforceable. The Supreme Court addressed, for the first time, whether businesses operating in North Dakota can enforce non-compete agreements against former employees by contractually mandating out of state venues and laws for disputes. Today’s ruling makes clear that out of state businesses doing business in North Dakota cannot circumvent North Dakota law by simply requiring employees to sign an employment agreement that requires the law of some other state to apply. As the Supreme Court explained: “Simply put, one may not contract for application of another state’s law or forum if the natural result is to allow enforcement of a non-compete agreement in violation of North Dakota’s longstanding and strong public policy against non-compete agreements.” This ruling could have significant implications for employers and employees across the state that have existing non-compete agreements purporting to apply out of state laws.
Osborne was represented by the Fremstad Law Firm. As explained by Joel Fremstad of Fremstad Law: “This is a victory not only for North Dakota employees, but also for North Dakota based businesses that are treating their employees fairly and understand the protections of North Dakota law, but have seen more and more out of state businesses try to use unfair tactics. This is also a victory for the many out of state businesses that are doing business in North Dakota and following North Dakota’s laws and protections for employees.”
Brown hired Osborne as a sales representative in its Fargo, North Dakota office to sell office supplies. Brown is headquartered in South Dakota. Brown required Osborne to sign an employment agreement whereby as a condition of employment Osborne had to agree that any disputes would be decided by a court in South Dakota, under South Dakota law. The employment agreement also included a clause that Osborne could not compete with Brown for a period of two years within 100 miles of Fargo. Brown let Osborne go in 2017 without cause, but nevertheless contended that under the employment agreement and South Dakota law, Osborne could not go to work for Brown’s competitors in Fargo selling office supplies. Osborne asked the District Court in Fargo to allow her to work on the basis of North Dakota’s explicit law against employee non-compete agreements. Brown opposed Osborne’s efforts in Fargo and brought a second law suit against Brown in South Dakota. Brown was represented by the Vogel Law Firm in North Dakota and by the law firm of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, LLP in South Dakota.
Contact: Joel Fremstad, Fremstad Law Firm, (O) 701-478-7620, (C) 701-361-8445, joel@fremstadlaw.com
© 2021 Fremstad Law
TERMS OF USE AND DISCLAIMER: Thank you for visiting the Fremstad Law Web site. Please note that the materials on our site have been prepared by us for general informational purposes and are not legal advice. We will not accept requests for legal advice over the Internet. You should not rely on any information contained herein in evaluating any specific legal issues you may have. Do not send us information about your legal issues until you speak to one of our lawyers and get authorization to do so. The firm does not and will not consider or treat any unsolicited e-mails or information sent to us, an attorney, or an employee of the firm by persons seeking legal advice or other non-clients to be confidential and the firm reserves the unconditional right to disclose or use any such unsolicited e-mails or information for any purpose. Your use of our Web site and/or sending e-mail to us or one of our lawyers does not create a lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer-client relationship is not created except by a written acknowledgment of such an engagement signed by a member of the firm. For your convenience, our Web site may contains links to other third-party sites. We do not endorse or verify the accuracy of information on such sites and are not responsible for the contents of any of these third-party resources. The inclusion of such link on this site does not imply the endorsement, recommendation or approval of that site by Fremstad Law.